You need to be logged in to post messages in our forums.
Please login or if you do not have an account then you can register an account for free.
Manchester Airport Forum | NVR July Continued
It really is not good enough on MAPLC's part, nor that simple to pass off the extremely poor passenger experience as 'nothing to do with us - it's all the UKBA's fault'.
The approach to the Passport Control area is from either side of the pier into a tiny space that might be more suitable for somewhere the size Blackpool Airport and it gets totally overwhelmed even by one full flight. Queues build up from both sides of the pier and passengers jostle and push to get ahead of the queue.
It was not UKBA that designed this space it was MAPLC, it was not UKBA but MAPLC that decided in its warped wisdom to transfer full service carriers over to a facility where 'full service' disappears as soon as you step off the aircraft.
There are (I think) only 5 desks in this narrow space, one of which is permanently used for non EU. Often these are fully manned, but are overwhelmed by numbers, so there's no point in blaming UKBA on this point either
Well said. Whilst usually delays at the border are down to UKBA short-staffing, in this case it is MAplc to blame. I realise Ryanair wanted to move to T3 but in order to accomodate that MA should have expanded the immigration hall in T3. If that's not possible then they shouldn't have allowed the move. From what I hear outbound security is really struggling to cope as well so the whole terminal is unsuitable for FR's operations. For the record there are no E-Gates in T3 immigration due to lack of space, so I'm sure an expansion of the hall full-stop is probably unlikely. I would imagine MA would seek a guarantee from UKBA that if we expanded the hall they would staff it fully and in the present climate UKBA couldn't make that promise.
The news that SU is still on our radar is very pleasing. Do we have any idea of a frequency world_rep? I'm sure last time we heard anything it was a daily service?
StarMonarA380
Maybe that could force some action?
Its also going to add a daily BHX, 4 weekly EDI and daily LGW.
Do you happen to know the a/c types? Are we sticking with the A330 - 200/300 mix?
We will be a B787/A330 mix. BHX/EDI will be B787 and LGW A330.
Quoting world_rep, from a previous postYes mines from an internal source.
We will be a B787/A330 mix. BHX/EDI will be B787 and LGW A330.
Many thanks. It will be good to get back to double daily in line with EY
These have got some (good) news for MAN in the next few months too. All will be revealed!
Good news about QR, I remember saying when I said they were dropping flights that they'd be back double daily by October, seems they are short of aircraft until the new year.
I wonder how the MAN and BHX services will work together. EK run them well side by side. Although I did read a report where Tom Clarke said the a380 service was drawing pax away from BHX. interesting
Quoting MartinJW12, from a previous postCould Qatar or Etihad be in line for more regional services later?
Etihad have got some big plans for MAN, so not sure about them, but Im assuming Qatar will need a fair while to bed the EDI/BHX/LGW services in before adding even more.
Appreciate you can't fully 'spill the beans' at this stage, but could you say whether these big plans are likely to further restrict the prospects of direct flights to say Hong Kong, Thailand or India (by increased EY frequencies to Abu Dhabi) or do they involve flights from MAN continuing westbound?
Booking engines currently say its a B737-500 on all flights, but doubt that's what will actually run.
Been off today and looking through a few booking engines, and noticed the following:
MAN-TXL on LH is minimum of £258 one way for the next week. Not bad!
MAN-MAD on Easyjet is on average, £28 more expensive than LPL-MAD, so bemused as to why MAN is cut but LPL is not?
MAN-SXF is on average £32 more than LPL-SXF.
Can only dream it's an upgrade on the EY21/22 to an A346 so I can finally see the F1 Jet (A6-EHJ)... one can only wish.
There are currently 2 plans. The second one is very much dependant how much the government can pull their finger out.
Plan A is well publicised already, its the 3rd daily flight, with a very high probability that F class will be introduced.
Quoting Sam-at-MAN, from a previous postConfirmed that FR are back down to 2 aircraft for the winter
Shame, but I cannot say Im totally surprised. Ryanair do tend to 'over exaggerate' their plans. Im still waiting for the 10 based aircraft at BHX!
However, given we will gain 2 aircraft again in April time, could MAD return with them?
Im also guessing this puts paid to 6 aircraft from them? Not Ryanairs style to add 4 aircraft to a base in 1 go.
You can have an 'aircraft view' option, where you have a flight sim style view, and is pretty cool.
Quoting world_rep, from a previous postIm also guessing this puts paid to 6 aircraft from them? Not Ryanairs style to add 4 aircraft to a base in 1 go.
I tend to agree. The problem is that if TCX did downsize still further, we would need compensating extra capacity from somewhere. MON seem fully stretched with a new base at LBA and significant expansion at BHX so that leaves TOM and Easyjet. Have you heard anything further world-rep re easyjet's plans for s2013. Is an 8 a/c base still a possibility?
As for Ryanair, didn't MOL say something like "we'll expand as fast as Manchester Airport wants us to"? Mind you, as has been pointed out, T3 struggles if 2 or 3 FR a/c arrive at the same time so 6 based might present a real problem.
Quoting Sam-at-MAN, from a previous postConfirmed that FR are back down to 2 aircraft for the winter
Sam, I don't suppose you've any inkling yet as to what they might be doing for s2013. Is it slot applications (Nov.?) that gives some sort of clue?
As for EY heard along the same lines. 3rd daily to be announced soon with a start next year, along with introducing F.
I saw A6-EHJ for the first time a couple of months ago when I was staying with family near LHR it is so beautiful in the flesh.
Just directly spoke to the head honcho of Aeroflot for the UK/Eire.
They say Manchester is not in the 2013 operating plan, but is defiantly in the 2014 operating plan. It will be a daily flight, and it will be on the A319.
Its likely the flight will arrive into MAN at approx 10:00, leaving at 11:00.
So, not so great for 2013, but, you can't really get more official than that, other than tickets going on sale, so not a bad source and at least quells the rumours for a while.
Dublin is apparently off the plan until 2015 now, so shows its not a MAN issue.
Not seen Jet2 mention for this route, but I am sure it would fit into there city break programme,which they seem to run successfully.
A
I think what's slightly worrying about this is that Ryanair have not cut all services to MAD, some routes just having frequency reductions. But MAN is in the 'binned' group.
Similarly, easyjet, although closing the base, are only stopping 20% of their routes to MAD, and guess what, MAN is in the 20%.
We've lost some long haul routes in the past when a/c have been required for more profitable operations, and it does seem that some of MAN's services are marginal at best, which is unfortunate.
This is not true of some of our other services of course, which have been reported in the past as being among an airline's most profitable routes.
Why all 3 carriers should pull MAD though remains baffling. I wonder what the issue is:- fares, yields,
operating costs at MAN as well as MAD. It would be good to know what the airport are doing to try and plug the gap, unless one of the carriers has given an indication they will be back next year.
FR have been performing very strongly of late: today for example I think 140 pax outbound was the 'lowest' load I saw. MAD is a strange one, loads on FR are constantly strong, one of the better performing routes. Be interesting if it doesn't appear on the route map again soon. I'd like to think MON will give it a go, maybe jet2 As well.
EY015 191 245
EK021 192 227
QR041 222 160
UA020 166 165
SQ328 142 216
UA100 117 came in late again so no outbound figures.
AA210 168 179 also came in late having stopped at Dublin for fuel. Headwinds??
AA054 206 215
TK1993 120 135
DL8953 DL A319 with 77 pax and 177 bags I presume for Olympic athletes based in the North west.
EK017 431
EY021 248
EK019 325
A pretty good set of figures I'd say very healthy.
Cheers from Jimsdad
At least the UA Washington made it at all today, cancelled on both Wednesday and yesterday!
Quoting TOM787, from a previous postAt least the UA Washington made it at all today, cancelled on both Wednesday and yesterday!
The USA is experiencing some freak weather at the moment, massively high temperatures. I'm wondering if the record highs in New York are causing aircraft issues (Washington too).
Quoting Sam-at-MAN, from a previous postHad a chat with the Libyan station manager today and it looks like they'll be back here in the near future...
the fact that he's still there says a lot!
Just a shame that we can't get Mahan back with all the politicking and other crap. There is certainly demand.
This hopefully may make Singapore look at decoupling the Munich leg from the Man flight as demand direct from Munich should see an increase to warrant a direct flight of its own......
As for UA, I'd like to say the weather. The washington was delayed yesterday and is today due to weather, the cancellations on Wednesday and Thursday were due to tech aircraft and 'crew hours' respectively.
I know that wouldn't increase the cargo capacity but then again is it needed?
Flights are likely to follow the JFK pattern and op back direct to Pakistan.
As for SQ, the route screams A350 but it's too early obviously. They plan on using the XWB for longhaul routes like MAN and the superior economics will make the route even more viable if they go that way. It will also give MAN their newest and freshest cabin product.
EY015 133 261
EK021 173 237
UA020 152 168
SQ328 130 228
AA210 157 178
AA054 181 217
TK1993 141 160 A321 today i believe
BRU853 120 106 Belavia from Minsk USSR
EK017 495
QR045 232
EY021 137
EK019 318
Pretty good figures again I'd say but why are Mid East routes busier outbound?
Qatar are also hoping to go back up to double daily next year, but they are going to fly out of BHX too so it might not happen either, have to wait. PIA to LAX makes me cry, gives us that nice NZ - 787 route that I keep dreaming of!
Quoting ZK-0KA, from a previous postQatar are also hoping to go back up to double daily next year, but they are going to fly out of BHX too so it might not happen either, have to wait.
They have said it's purely down to aircraft shortages. As the 787s start arriving then they can restore frequencies to MAN, start up BHX and even return to LGW.
Ryanair have frequently closed services where charges increased. All we can hope is that AENA don't strangle airports like Malaga too. It's a shame that new airport next to the train line was never finished.
Glad to hear PK are expanding again, at one point they were talking of canning USA flights altogether, firstly with the TK hook-up and then with the 6-hour layovers at MAN for security checks. LAX was rumoured internally a few years back, interesting that it's finally come to light although as already pointed out it will only be one way so it's hardly plugging the MAN-LAX-MAN market gap we've been seeking. I believe PK have more 77Ws on order so these must be for USA expansion.
I join the list of confused people wondering why FR are canning MAD, it has been one of their strongest routes since starting from here! We really need to get a replacement carrier onboard for MAD, really don't want us to be back to square one with no service to such a major European city, especially now it's been proven how much demand there is!
StarMonarA380
Quoting StarMonarA380, from a previous postI join the list of confused people wondering why FR are canning MAD, it has been one of their strongest routes since starting from here
I reckon it's just down to the increase in fees at Madrid airport. The Spanish government is trying to rake in every last Euro they can and some taxes (like cigarettes and booze) have really taken a walloping.
Maybe MAG have to be a bit more proactive here and see if there is anything that can be done from this end, because it looks like AENA are playing hardball in Spain at their LHR-equivalent. The coastal airports are a third rail issue, but Ryanair did kick off about the fees increase at Gerona.
I'm just floating this as a theory but with the Spanish economy on the bones of its arse the state owned airport operator has probably been whipped like a rented mule and told to up the fees.
Quoting whitehatter, from a previous postI reckon it's just down to the increase in fees at Madrid airport.
I'm sure you'r right that this is the reason for cut-backs by both easyjet and Ryanair at MAD. However, easy are still going to be running a sizeable list of services from other bases, as I believe are Ryanair, so the issue is why MAN is in the batch of routes to be axed by both carriers if it is doing so well.
On a separate topic, there is a rumour on pprune that Jet2 have just delayed an announcement of a new base at LPL, rather than abandoned plans altogether. Has anyone on here got any information about this story? If it happens, I don't see how it could be interpreted as good news for MAN even if Jet2's operation here does not contract or even grows slightly. I suppose the analogy would be of the cake in the region getting bigger but MAN's slice staying the same size i.e a fall in market share. The same might apply in terms of the new MON base at LBA when LN-KGL's analysis showed a significant proportion of MAN's pax come from Yorkshire, although as has been mentioned by others, access to LBA by road or rail is far from ideal.
On a more positive note, the loads on our long haul routes look pretty encouraging. Fingers crossed for the rumoured expansion by EY, the return of QR to 2 x daily and SU in 2014. Other possibilities seem to be AA to Miami and (eventually?) a route to China.
Currently they fly 5 x weekly with an A340-300. Passengers are being rebooked on the Frankfurt - Singapore route with the A380.
Anyway, with SQ still doing MAN - MUN - SIN, could this have a negative impact on/delay the possibility of SQ flying MAN - SIN direct again?
World_rep, do you know about EIN too? Saw some interesting stuff regarding them at MAN.
Regarding EIN rumour, is it the one about an A330 being a very regular visitor?
Also TNT supposed to be running a daily STN with B737.
Lastly, what were the air new zealand rumours you referred to on the movements thread? Just been to LAX, saw 4 B77W's inc the all blacks jet, plus a B767. Very nice liveries!

An advanced warning, I saw this notice on the way through T3 at MAN a couple of weeks ago.
RyanAir are now allowing one additional airport bag onto the aircraft as well as your cabin bag. Great news I thought, I can bring a couple of bottles back from Malaga with me.
As we progressed through the security checks at Malaga on our return, an overhead information board said it was a legal right to take an additional airport bag on board your aircraft. It had to be in an "official duty free bag" purchased for 20 cents when you buy your alcohol.
No problem, two bottles of Soberano in an official plastic carrier and off to the RyanAir gate.
The two staff checking boarding cards decided I could not take an extra bag through unless I placed it in my cabin luggage so I get my phone out with a photo of the notice to be told "this does not apply to RyanAir'.
After much arguing other staff were called and I was not allowed onto the aircraft unless the bottles were placed inside my cabin luggage.
Luckily I did have enough room in my bag for the bottles but I could have easily been faced with a difficult situation had my bag been full.
Anyone travelling to Malaga, and possibly other destination, beware.
http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1584064_manchester-airport-named-one-of-worlds-top-destinations-for-plane-spotting
Quoting world_rep, from a previous postRegarding EIN rumour, is it the one about an A330 being a very regular visitor?
May well be... EIN have applied for and been granted slots, but haven't specified a destination or aircraft type.
Quoting world_rep, from a previous postLastly, what were the air new zealand rumours you referred to on the movements thread? Just been to LAX, saw 4 B77W's inc the all blacks jet, plus a B767. Very nice liveries
There was talk of Air NZ making an appearance during the Olympics but all seems to have gone quiet
Quoting Spike, from a previous postAn advanced warning, I saw this notice on the way through T3 at MAN a couple of weeks ago.
MAG forced FR into allowing a duty free bag on board, and it's just MAN specific as far as I know rather than network wide
AA to cancel the seasonal ORD-DUB from next year. Extra B767-300 to be shipped to MIA for the MAN flights.
UA to announce SFO-DUB/MAN for next year.
Aer Lingus regional to run BHD-MAN amongst others
Singapore to de-link MUC-MAN, and MAN being a 6 weekly direct flight. (MAN's weakest day is tuesday so maybe that cut)
Phillipine airlines have applied for 10 slots at MAN, make of that what you will.
Quoting world_rep, from a previous postPhillipine airlines have applied for 10 slots at MAN, make of that what you will.
They can apply for as many slots as they like however till they are removed from the EU black list won't be seen anywhere within the EU any time soon.
Could that be a greenish A332 codeshare per-chance ?
Quoting rutankrd, from a previous postThey can apply for as many slots as they like however till they are removed from the EU black list won't be seen anywhere within the EU any time soon.
Yeah, I agree. Thats why I said make of it what you will.
No, 5 weekly B767-300 in a 2 class configuration. Not sure exactly on the DUB flights.
I would expect BCN/FCO, but, given the connections with BA/IB, and that the 2 airlines are using carriers based at 'the other end' for codeshare flights (AA for example), I wonder if MAN could be featured to expand the UK market, especially given the UK-Brazil market is picking up quite quickly.
4 weekly to Rio on an A332 could go down a treat!
just a guess i would consider Copenhagen (Old Varig route) Amsterdam (Both strong cargo and SLF in past) and Lisbon obvious cultural synergies as missing links for LATAM
A South America - Manchester direct service (Not counting charters to Margarita!)could be along way off , London struggles with links to this region as it is !
BA to Rio and Sao Paulo always full and high yielding, TAM doing well and plenty connecting through Iberia.
There are quite a few connections from MAN to Brazil, my partners dad being a regular through CDG due to always struggling to get flights ex-UK.
The issue with LHR is slots, so MAN could be a remedy.
Add to this, BA internally and recently said 'we aim to increase our MAN international presence through our codeshares offered by our oneworld and franchise partners''
Just a thought.
Also are Iran Air banned from entering EU airspace?
Yes and No
Iranair may only operate certain approved Airbus A310/306 and 300F airframes into and through EU airspace.
Additionally US and companies trading with US businesses may not trade with any Iranian company including Iranair. This is causing them fuel issues on EU operations - they have to find Russian fuel companies in the main so use Budapest/Belgrade as tech stops.
That said none of this has any relevance to Manchester does it ?
There is expansion coming on MAN - Tel Aviv with EasyJet joining existing operator Jet2 on the route from this Autumn. No news from El Al at present; would they be interested in a three-way battle anyway? In any case, MAN is better served by developing routes sustainably rather than encouraging a bunfight like Madrid recently and Berlin in the past which results in all the operators losing money and withdrawing en masse. EXS and EZY should represent sufficient capacity for MAN-TLV at this stage.
Quoting Shed-on-a-Pole, from a previous postEXS and EZY should represent sufficient capacity for MAN-TLV at this stage
Shame easyjet have gone for the same days as Jet however.
I think its a bit silly that there are 2 flights a day to somewhere on Monday, then you have to wait until Thursday for the next one!
I also hear rumours that Air Blue have been bought out by PIA, so that might be one to keep your eye on in the future.
Quoting Sam-at-MAN, from a previous postI also hear rumours that Air Blue have been bought out by PIA, so that might be one to keep your eye on in the future
Oh god I hope not. Air Blue are actually half way to being reliable, and I would trust Air Blue to expand more at Manchester.
Ah well.
Quoting world_rep, from a previous postShame easyjet have gone for the same days as Jet however.
I think its a bit silly that there are 2 flights a day to somewhere on Monday, then you have to wait until Thursday for the next one!
Just the vagaries of the Israeli working week.
No orthodox will travel Friday/Saturday compounded with Sunday am always being light ex UK in general . So its Monday and Thursday being peak travel days.
If an extra flight gets added it will be Wednesday.
Sam i do hope the Generals haven't got their corrupt hands on Air Blue and agree El Al were/are a nightmare to have to deal with.
Just out of interest, when were the check-in desks in the train station used? Last I recall was Chav City Direct using them
Quoting Pole Hill Sid, from a previous postStood Southside getting bitten to death, whilst the sun slowly disappears and still no sign of EHC. Hope it's not a wasted journey! :-(
Just says final boarding on website Pole
A380-800
From Travel Mole:
Ryanair to axe flights to Spain
Ryanair has become the latest budget airline to axe flights to Spain following a doubling of airport taxes.
EasyJet announced last week that it was closing its Madrid base and cutting the number of flights to Spain by 7% this winter due to the higher charges.
Now Ryanair has confirmed it will drop flights from the UK to both Madrid and Barcelona this winter.
It is axing 11 routes to Madrid, including flights from Manchester, and four routes to Barcelona, including flights from East Midlands and Leeds Bradford. It is also reducing frequency on many routes from both airports, including to Edinburgh, Glasgow and Liverpool from Barcelona.
Ryanair said the decision was in response to a doubling of airport departure taxes from July 1.
From November, Ryanair will base three fewer aircraft at Madrid and two fewer at Barcelona's El Prat airport.
Quoting DomyDom, from a previous postEasyJet announced last week that it was closing its Madrid base and cutting the number of flights to Spain by 7% this winter due to the higher charges.
Now Ryanair has confirmed it will drop flights from the UK to both Madrid and Barcelona this winter.
I guess this is where 'austerity' gets you. Not like Madrid would benefit from tourism, direct business connections or anything.
As it's State owned, the move will be to get it profitable and then sell it off (Greece all over again basically). The money masters will want anything and everything to be up for sale if bailouts happen.
AENA will probably be split into the navigation arm and the property arm, and the assets division first to go. Fattening that particular pig for sale is already underway.
Quoting Sam-at-MAN, from a previous postJust out of interest, when were the check-in desks in the train station used? Last I recall was Chav City Direct using them
TCD were the last operator to use them as full check-in facilities. VS came very close to signing up to operate through there around 4 years ago but it fell through at the 11th hour. The Corsair 744 charters to DME for the Champions League Final 08 checked in at those desks but those flights were hand-luggage only.
Quoting world_rep, from a previous postAA to cancel the seasonal ORD-DUB from next year. Extra B767-300 to be shipped to MIA for the MAN flights.
UA to announce SFO-DUB/MAN for next year.
Aer Lingus regional to run BHD-MAN amongst others
Singapore to de-link MUC-MAN, and MAN being a 6 weekly direct flight. (MAN's weakest day is tuesday so maybe that cut)
Phillipine airlines have applied for 10 slots at MAN, make of that what you will.
All very exciting stuff. UA to SFO in particular would be awesome, and AA returning to MIA and SQ returning to direct SIN would also be excellent news.
SQ 6x weekly is great as well - remember that they were 3x weekly direct before switching to the service via MUC. Do we know what aircraft we would see? I seem to recall they are slowly phasing out their 772 fleet, so with the A330 lacking the legs would we be likely to see a 77W? More importantly, would they keep F from MAN to keep up with EK (and soon EY)?
StarMonarA380
Quoting StarMonarA380, from a previous postTCD were the last operator to use them as full check-in facilities. VS came very close to signing up to operate through there around 4 years ago but it fell through at the 11th hour. The Corsair 744 charters to DME for the Champions League Final 08 checked in at those desks but those flights were hand-luggage only.
Cheers for that

Just out of curiosity, logistically, how do they get bags from GTI to (T2?) baggage?
Sam
Goes up to 22 weekly from 18 weekly (Will now be 4 daily M-F and 2 daily Su)
Quoting Sam-at-MAN, from a previous postJust out of curiosity, logistically, how do they get bags from GTI to (T2?) baggage?
If you look around the back of The Station (near where the buses park) there's a shutter with a conveyor sticking out into a yard. The bags come out there and are loaded onto baggage carts, then driven round to T2 Service Yard. With security escorting they are taken through the gate airside (opposite Gate 300) where they are loaded onto a conveyor and fed directly into the baggage system, they then follow the usual route through the x-rays and down to the chutes.
Quite logistically complicated, which is why TCD/XL eventually moved to checking in with the other carriers in T2 Main Check-In.
StarMonarA380
EY015 211 210
EK021 204 130
QR041 234 152
UA020 152 156
SQ328 162 209
UA100 78 not supplied
AA210 170 not supplied
AA054 191 154
TK1993 129 129
EK017 384
QR045 214
EY021 214
TK1995 115
I went home before the last 4 outbound figures were available.
Cheers from Jim
UA looking strong in the coming weeks, showing good loads, as is EK outbound. Sure I've seen a spell during August when all three of their flights are pretty much full outbound, very good considering the upgrade of equipment on the 21/22 from 01AUG. Confident as we hit August and summer really swings in our network of routes is in good shape!
Some more pax figures from today's flights until the end of my shift.
EY015 167 256
EK021 184 190
UA020 145 162
SQ328 110 194
UA100 158 156
AA210 164 179
AA054 182 not provided today
EK017 362
EY021 183
BRU853 125 105
TK1993 117 147
That's it for today.
Just an observation from the post on the movements page re the Atlas Air 747 return with Man Uni--ted squad on board could it be they're still sulking and are still very bitter over a certain dissapointing Sunday in May.
I've also heard from a colleague on T3 that Mr R. Ferdinand caused problems yesterday over removing his shoes when asked to do so mind you he always is rude and awkward towards staff. I've seen and experienced it myself from him. God's gift he certainly isn't and is subject to the same rules as anybody else including airport staff.
Guess who I support.
Cheers from Jim
Quoting jimsdad, from a previous postGod's gift he certainly isn't and is subject to the same rules as anybody else including airport staff.
He should use some of his spare change to hire a biz jet next time instead of flying Ryanair...
Upload Your Photos!
Quick Uploading
Our upload form allows you to fill in the aircraft data while your photo uploads in the background making it what we believe to be the quickest aviation photo upload form on the net.
We even give you a progress bar showing how long until your photo is uploaded!
Quick Screening
We screen most photos within 24 hours.
Any rejections are always given comments detailing the reasons.
Join our growing list of photographers and upload your shots to Plane Mad.

1 - by whitehatter 





Rate Us On
Please Wait - Loading