You need to be logged in to post messages in our forums.
Please login or if you do not have an account then you can register an account for free.
Manchester Airport Forum | NVR July into Aug
G-BYGE and the EK B77W right behind it almost diverted to MAN. Long holds then go-arounds due to aircraft blocking the runway. ATC advised of further holding and both asked for MAN. Luckily issue was resolved and they got in.
I've concluded that with all the holding fuel a/c must carry these days, it would take single runway ops for an extended period at LHR, or a severe thunderstorm on final approach for an hour in the summer, or a 'snoclo' for at least an hour in the winter, before we can think of getting diversions. It must be the third or fourth time this summer that there's been long holding delays with just about everything getting in.
Not sure if this has been mentioned before, but MAN - BRU only seems to be bookable up to 10 Sept.
If they are dropping this route, it just leaves the 4 flights by Brussels Airlines.
Apart from tweaking schedules to provide better domestic connections, there doesn't seem to be anything new following the big announcement about the MAN hub, and it's disappointing if they are now cutting a European destination.
Which long haul carriers are they supposed to be linking with for connections at MAN?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/blog/2012/jul/13/book-flybe-flight-tickets?newsfeed=true
flybe has also cancelled Birmingham-Hamburg and Southampton-Frankfurt from September, so Manchester hasn't been singled out as the only place to reduce the activity.
MAN-DUB/SNN/ORK on the list, so Im assuming the SNN/ORK-MAN is aimed at pushing more passengers our way.
Quoting world_rep, from a previous postin at 0855 as EY8274 from Kuala Lumpur, out at 1055 as EY8275 to Abu Dhabi.
Thanks for that worldrep
, appreciate it
There has been a recent presentation by the easyjet board of directors, and it states that after MAD, LPL is the least profitable base in the network.
It states that 2 more aircraft will be pulled out of LPL, along with:
That's the thinking behind Madrid. The other outlier, in case you ask a question, is Liverpool and that's as a result of a long-term deal that was entered into in 2001; it's still got 8.5 years to run. So we're managing that against that long-term deal. We are actually going to pull out some more capacity from Liverpool; going to take out another two aircraft from there for the winter. I just wanted to share with you another of the tools that we're using to work on the network
So it seems that after the 8.5 years are up, it looks unlikely Easyjet will remain at LPL (obviously things can change in that amount of time), but certainly reads like its only the contract keeping them there.
Seems opening the MAN based has caused irreparable damage to the Liverpool base.
So, once again, it begs the question, why was MAN-MAD dropped but LPL kept?
Link: http://corporate.easyjet.com/~/media/Files/E/Easyjet-Plc-V2/pdf/investors/results-centre/2012/q3-presentation-25072012a.pdf
Also, Ryanair have reported MAN is performing strongly, so one has to wonder why have they pulled 2 aircraft for the winter?
Quoting world_rep, from a previous postAlso, Ryanair have reported MAN is performing strongly, so one has to wonder why have they pulled 2 aircraft for the winter?
I suppose it has to be put in the context of opening the base last winter with 2 based a/c and FR parking up a/c generally for the winter. It's the same as last winter for MAN but perhaps disappointing they've not increased the operation here. It would be interesting to know the total number of weekly flights, including those from other bases, and how it stacks up against last winter. However, what happens next summer will certainly be interesting.
As regards easyjet, it seems that those who suggested the airline had a 20 year deal with LPL were right after all, incredible though it may seem. I wonder if it stated a minimum number of a/c based or just a more general commitment to operate there. Maybe Madrid is one of the better performing routes from LPL.
Quoting MANDIV, from a previous postI wonder if it stated a minimum number of a/c based or just a more general commitment to operate there.
Im assuming its just a commitment, as it seems to be saying that it is taking 2 aircraft away without much of a fanfare.
Quoting MANDIV, from a previous postAs regards easyjet, it seems that those who suggested the airline had a 20 year deal with LPL were right after all, incredible though it may seem
Yes it seems so, but do you agree that it looks like they are not very committed after the contract finishes? One also wonders whether if LPL was to close, MAN would gain (as whilst it says LPL is their most unprofitable base (now MAD base is gone), one would assume there are at least some routes that do well, Madrid being of of them given they continued that but ended MAN)
Given they will jump from 2 based in winter to 6 in summer (a lot of Ryanair people adamant that MAN will get 6), I suppose it could be a case of the following if expansion trend is followed:
2011 winter: 2 based
2012: summer 4 based,winter 2 based
2013: summer 6 based, winter 4 based
2014: Summer 8 based, winter 6 based
Regarding easyjet, I've had a thought about this strange MAD situation we find ourselves in (I remember stating a while ago I would eat my hat if we were left without a MAD route before Christmas, who is eating humble pie now haha!). My idea is this: could U2 have signed an agreement within an agreement with LPL to run some routes, such as MAD, regardless? I mean if MAD is more profitable from MAN than it is from LPL but the former is the one being cut it makes no sense. And I find the answer to this intriguing; when MAD started from LPL was MAN without a MAD route? So did LPL 'write' it into the U2 contract to serve the LPL-MAD route as it was unserved from MAN?
I have no inside knowledge but I think that we will see MAD back next year. MAD will not be happy with those routes being pulled as they will loose business. I hear from people in Spain that there has been some flexibility now shown by MAD on landing fees, whether is is enough to get our route back however I don't know.
EY015 134 191
EK021 130 98
EK017 226
EY8724 78 went out empty to AUH having dropped off the Champions!!
UA020 133 163
SQ328 113 180
UA100 130 159
AA210 156 178
AA054 187 215
QR045 212
I don't often get celebs through Transfer's but we did today. The author and star of lot's of TV series etc Angela Lansbury came through en route Abu Dhabi to Cork, complete with a full set of replacement knees and hips. Age gets to us all eventually.
Also MCFC goalie Costel Pantilimon. We had to lift the roof to get him through. He's approaching 7feet tall!!!He was going to Munich with Lufthansa. Looked very fresh after a 14 hour flight.
Cheers everyone from Jim.
Quoting jimsdad, from a previous postThe author and star of lot's of TV series etc Angela Lansbury came through en route Abu Dhabi to Cork, complete with a full set of replacement knees and hips. Age gets to us all eventually.
Thanks for that jimsdad. Have to admit I still enjoy watching the repeats of "Murder She Wrote" but I guess she must be getting on a bit now.
As to the figures, the US loads are good outbound and ok inbound, but it's evidently a quieter period for the MEB3
Very quiet considering Emirates will be sending in the B773 on the EK21/22 from Tomorrow.
Looking ahead, it seems there are only 4 seats left in F on the EK21/22, and 3 on the EK17/18 tomorrow. Meanwhile Y is wide open, so shows we are making money even if the loads are light!
However, the EK21/22 has a couple of EQV changes in Aug:
All other flights B777-300 unless stated below:
2nd-B777-300ER
3rd-B777-200ER
6th-B777-200ER
8th-B777-300ER (Sold out)
Good to see IAD is just as stable as EWR in terms of loads, yields are not that far behind it either.
RE: MAN-MAD Easyjet. LPL-MAD is indeed well established and I'm sure at the time the decision was made, it was probably thought to protect the LPL service rather than battle it out with FR and IB (both of who have also now dropped the route). Curiously, Easyjet haven't yet informed passengers that the route isn't operating so who knows what they have planned. Things seem up in the air regarding MAD and it wouldn't surprise me if MAD made a return at some point, possibly with ZRH.
New routes for next year are looking increasingly like VCE, KEF and JMK. Nothing confirmed still but the first two routes come from directly from a most reliable source within the carrier.
Moscow also being evaluated from both LON and MAN. Yes I know they need to apply for rights but nevertheless it's being looked at.
Yes she set the AMD archway metal detector off from bottom to top. She was very pleasant and went on her way. She wont often get recognised from her boarding pass in many airports but she did here.
And you admit to watching ' Murder she wrote 'Murderer announced after an hour ok will live with that.
Cheers Mandiv
Quoting world_rep, from a previous postSeems STN is to have the star movement of the Olympics (in my eyes). China Southern A380 in for a week 31st July-6th Aug. Shame that didn't come for parking along with the Gabon B777!
A380 was swapped for 2 A330's apparently
Thanks for that resume of Angela Landsburys career. Wow I'm bowled over. The reference to Cork Southern Ireland confirms where she was travelling to. Cheers and many thanks again.
Cheers again from Jimsdad.
Manchester Airport @manairport
TAP Portugal confirms it will boost Lisbon - @manairport route from 5 times weekly to daily in W12/13 due to strong demand
Manchester Airport @manairport
According to TAP Portugal, average loads on Lisbon - @manairport hit 84% in July; carried 48k passengers since June 2011
Quoting groobs, from a previous postCurrently in Malaysia but back on the EK21 on the 5th. I assume no planned changes from the 777-300? How is J class looking?
Currently 8 seats available in J, and will be on the B777-300 (non ER)
Quoting Betablockeruk, from a previous postTAP Portugal confirms it will boost Lisbon - @manairport route from 5 times weekly to daily in W12/13 due to strong demand
Pitty the airlines themselves don't know what their own routes are doing, its currently 6 weekly not 5!
Sounds good for TAP but obviously disappointing for us.
Did I not read somewhere that it was going to 10 pw next summer as well?
1st-9th Sept B777-300ER
1st November- Full switch to the B777-300ER.
At one time last year there was talk of a MAN- TAP route. Has anyone heard anything?
Quoting DomyDom, from a previous postAt one time last year there was talk of a MAN- TAP route. Has anyone heard anything?
Sorry meant MAN-OPO
There was talk of adding OPO, but its taking a lot longer to bring about due to needing another PGA F100 to run the flights. This in turn would need other routes to come online, as the aircraft would be idle between MAN flights, so as you can see its a bit of a logistical nightmare.
Quoting The Middle Marker, from a previous postOn this flight myself next week for a short break. Tried to book for an extra friend to come along on their website yesterday and got the response that there were no available seats
Outbound availability for next week:
Monday: 3J 5Y 9R A319
Wednesday: 4J 11Y 3R F100
Thursday: 7J 18Y 4R F100
Friday: 8J 16Y 6R A319
Saturday: 5J 14Y 3R F100
Sunday: 4J 6Y 2R F100
J= Business, Y= Economy R= Economy full fare
Not a bad week ahead for TAP.
Good to see TAP doing well, used them last year (there's a trip report floating about on here somewhere) and they did a perfectly adequate job.
I remarked at the time that plenty of those checking in were connecting onto long haul flights to South America, so obviously it is doing well.
They will obviously be slightly older inside, but, they are known for doing the short, low density, very high yield routes (18 First seats as opposed to 12), so, cannot be too bad.
How does it stay committed to its cause, its introduces 2 new routes between the 2 so called offenders: TFS-MAD and BCN!!
Madness!
Outbound availability for next week:
Monday: 3J 5Y 9R A319
Wednesday: 4J 11Y 3R F100
Thursday: 7J 18Y 4R F100
Friday: 8J 16Y 6R A319
Saturday: 5J 14Y 3R F100
Sunday: 4J 6Y 2R F100
J= Business, Y= Economy R= Economy full fare
Not a bad week ahead for TAP.
Very Interesting!!
Any idea why their website would be saying there are no seats available for the selected dates? It was only yesterday when I tried.
Seems mighty odd.
Was on 3 different EK 777s in the last four weeks. Quite honestly their C Class product is poor compared to others. One of them was positively tatty.
The A330 is even worse - almost unacceptable nowhere near enough space, particularly elbow room.
Get yourself on their A380 if you want to experience a proper C Class.
Or try Etihad or Qatar next time. Much better
WR, 18 seats for F? It'll be interesting to see how many are filled. I flew DXB-NRT a couple of weeks ago and there were just 4 of us in first, and that was on the newly launched A380 route.
Quoting groobs, from a previous postWR, 18 seats for F? It'll be interesting to see how many are filled.
Im not sure if its the case, but its saying on system there are only 6 seats left for sale in F on the day you fly.
Its also interesting to note, they switched the original, 12 seat B77W from MAN to LHR, and the 18 seat B773 from LHR to MAN. Must be a reason for them to do this.
Lucky you!
You'll know what I'm talking about then.
I find the bar at the back a bit too irresistible I'm afraid.
Can't wait for the next trip on it.
World rep, could they have swapped between MAN and LHR to put the higher standard 77W's down south? Mind you they wouldn't put so much F capacity up here unless it was warranted....
Quoting TOM787, from a previous postWorld rep, could they have swapped between MAN and LHR to put the higher standard 77W's down south? Mind you they wouldn't put so much F capacity up here unless it was warranted...
More than likely option A, because the fact F is full could be down to full fare pax, or could be cardholder upgrades.
Its defiantly not invol-upgrades as the lower cabins are light.
Two years ago, EK A380 business class to Sydney, 14 hour flight, 9 hours at the bar!
It really is the only way to fly
The top Olympic movement for me was the Russian IL-62 - brought back some memories !!!
How about the 1970s B727
Ian
Quoting world_rep, from a previous postOne for Sam-at-MAN. Any reason they stuck the BA218 on a T1 gate, with jetbridge attached?
What aircraft was it? Could be due to lack of 777 capable stands. Last night while I was in work they were doing some repairs to the taxiways around T2 which put a fair number of remote stands out of action
Although their schedules are loaded for s2013, it would seem the 4 x weekly flights to Paris stop at the end of October and don't return. The only new service I can recall seeing mentioned so far is a weekly to one of the Greek Islands or was it to Croatia? I've not studied frequencies for all the existing destinations.
A rather strange history with Jet2 at MAN - grew steadily to 7 or 8 based a/c, then cut back one summer to I think 6, to be followed by growth in the last couple of years to something like 10 based (catching up Leeds). For s2013, I believe LBA have got a few new flights which could necessitate an extra a/c, but from what I've heard, MAN, at best, will stay the same. I wonder if the rumoured LPL base by the LPL enthusiasts might be true. Has anyone here any information?
No celebs today I'm afraid only hum drum pax today.
EY015 165 209
EK021 115 258 first flight on B773 A6-EMQ today.
QR041 163 149
UA020 125 168
SQ328 140 157
AA210 159 182
AA54 169 no figures supplied
UA100 127 no figures but flight approx 3 hours late in.
EK017 272 323
EY021 166
EK019 217
That's it today.
Cheers from Jim
Quoting world_rep, from a previous postAny reason they stuck the BA218 on a T1 gate, with jetbridge attached?
Medical diverts are now allocated an airbridge stand where possible as time is a factor. An a/c parked out on remote may incur delays due to the time it take to get men and equipment there. As for stand 31, the only stand available in T3 capable of handling a 777 is Stand 44 which at the time was in use by a Flybe E195.
I think that seeing her land tipped it for me - as well as her sisters (IL96'S and IL76 TU154)
made me feel nostalgic - and I did see 4 VC10's parked at Brize on my way home !!
The 727 on any other day.......
I went on a B773 (EMV) from DXB to BKK in June and it was virtually the same inside as the ER (EBZ) from MAN to DXB. It looked like it had been refurbished.
The B772 (EME) from BKK to DXB was a different matter though. It looked very tired inside and the seats didn't seem as wide as the B77W or B773 as it felt very cramped.
Rather fly on an AF one and that's saying something, though I do admit I have a similar attraction to EK as I do to all white painted planes.
Today's pax figures
EY015 184 210
EK021 181 204
UA020 155 169
SQ328 97 186
AA210 162 167
AA054 207 214
EK017 311
EY021 134
QR045 187
EK019 290
No figs for UA100 from Washington it was delayed until 1630 arrival in Manchester
Cheers
Jimsdad
No they aren't...
SQ flight is split roughly 50/50 with Munich, which means with 186 passengers on the MAN-MUC leg we're filling 47 more seats than we 'should', including strong premium sales. Singapore also does very well on cargo which boosts revenue, so 186 outbound pax is far from 'terrible'. As for the 97 pax inbound, that still isn't a bad figure but it's also the wrong time of the year for inbound pax. Students are going back home for the summer and also people going on holiday during the holidays.
Qatars two class A332s have 260 seats, leaving less than 1/3rd of the aircraft empty on arrival. As with Singapore, in August QR tends to be more geared up to students returning home etc so inbound figures will be lower than outbound figures generally. QR also have a lucrative mail contract (which we took from LGW when they dropped flights to there) and do well on cargo.
In my opinion them figures are far from 'terrible', but if that's what you want to believe then of course you're allowed your own opinion
As for the following:
Quoting ThePeaLauncher, from a previous postMr i work at the airport so i am gods gift your a glassback, cant even respond to the PM you were sent .
Plane-mad is well known for having good quality discussions and debates, which I'm all for. I always have a chuckle at LN-KGL / world_reps constant debates regarding MAN's growth (or lack of growth depending who you listen to
) but I won't participate in childish name calling, which is why I didn't reply to your PM. If you want a civilized debate then go-ahead, but I won't be lowering myself to petty insults.Sam
be
1 passenger paying £6000 in F class is worth a lot more than 20 in Y class paying £200
Ian
Quoting ThePeaLauncher, from a previous postIMO Sam at MAnchester's post today was to be provocative so he got some of his own medicine back
No, Sam's post wasn't at all provocative. The fact that you took umbrage at it and launched into a tirade of vitreole is a failing on your part, not his. Your are treading a very fine line at present and, as a relatively new member, you need to show a little respect to others, especially those who work in the aviation sector and are probably better informed than you. Whilst you are very welcome to continue uploading 'relevant and interesting posts', I would ask that, in future, you please make certain to cut out the snide remarks and rude comments. That way, you will quickly become a valued member of our community...and I won't have to delete any more of your posts!
Baltimore
Site Moderator
Quoting ThePeaLauncher, from a previous postIf you look above sam at manchester has deliberately sniped at my post regarding PAX figures in order to cause trouble.
I pointed out that the figures weren't "terrible" and then went onto explain why they aren't terrible, there was no 'sniping' involved.
Quoting ThePeaLauncher, from a previous postIts not the first time he has tried to take a moral high ground type position over perhaps less informed members.
Errr, what? If a less informed member posts something and I might be able to add to the discussion or help elaborate on the point they've made then I'll do so, after all, it's a discussion board.
Quoting ThePeaLauncher, from a previous postHis reply to my comments on the figures "No they arent" was put on here only to stir up more of a hornets nest. Its ok having an old boys brigade type mentality but he was in the wrong given the way he caused mither on a previous post with his arrogant attitude.
In my opinion the figures were disappointed in particular the SQ flight given the aircraft type they are using it cant really be cost efficient.
I said the figures weren't terrible, and explained later on why they weren't terrible. I'm not going to repeat myself regarding Singapore's load factors and profitability as you can read that above.
Quoting ThePeaLauncher, from a previous postI did send sam at manchester a pm and told him i wanted to resolve this face to face but he hasnt even had the courtesy to reply.
I have no idea who you are or what your background is, I've got more sense than to meet someone anonymously off an internet forum, especially someone who displays the sort of attitude you do.
Quoting ThePeaLauncher, from a previous postQuite a few on here need to remember this hobby is diverse not everybody is at a certain level of knowledge and just because somebody hasnt been posting long it dosent make them an outsider.
Absolutely. I've met some great people through this hobby (many of whom are on this forum) and enjoy reading the debates and discussions posted on plane-mad every day, and certainly learn new things from them each day.
I've got nothing against you personally, and I don't understand why you've got it in for me. I treat everybody as equal on here and likewise respect fellow posters regardless of their opinions on certain subjects. There's a good number of well informed members who spend a hell of a lot of their own personal time moderating the forum, paying for their own pocket for the hosting costs and also collating information to share with us, which without them, wouldn't be available to the 'spotting community'. Steve Platt, Jimsdad, world_rep, betablocker, Star Moaner and Ian are just a handful of members who post excellent information and a little bit of respect to older members would go a long way.
Sam
Quoting ThePeaLauncher, from a previous postaint bothered if he works in the aviation industry or not if we are talking jobs i would suggest mine to be much more vital to the country's efforts being in the army.
And you call me arrogant?
Cheers..... Ian
I don't think so. Whether you like to or not, Sam is a respected member of our community who does not have a track record of abusing other members, which is more than can be said for your good self.
Quoting ThePeaLauncher, from a previous posta day off stop defending your mate and look properly at the bigger picture
I am having a day of tomorrow, as it happens, but I'll still be keeping an eye on the MAN Forum to make sure that you don't step out of line - again.
Quoting ThePeaLauncher, from a previous postif we are talking jobs i would suggest mine to be much more vital to the country's efforts being in the army.
That's interesting. I could have sworn that, earlier today, you said you work at the airport.
I'd stop digging a hole now, or the earth around you is going to cave in

Lying about your job isn't going to get you anywhere on here either, it's amazing what 10 minutes googling achieves.
Sam
Your words, not mine: "Mr i work at the airport so i am gods gift".
Erm, I don't think so. Being a site moderator, I have the ability to ban members (like you) who don't toe the line. You're on a yellow card and one more snide or rude remark (regardless of who it's aimed at) will definitely earn you a suspension.
er......As a reader and not much of a poster can I just state that I find your tone and language
to be totally out of order.Were you the one by any chance posting pills for sale - some time ago?
Whilst there is room for all on here - I would not miss your contributions I feel.
Or is it your intension all along to agitate members......(I nearly wrote 'because you have a small
penis') but stopped myself just in time !
Behave !!
Im sure the last few of your abusive vile message will be deleted and forgotton, like you. I hope you never post on these boards again.
Oh and Sam.... Thanks for the nice comments.
Steve
Upload Your Photos!
Quick Uploading
Our upload form allows you to fill in the aircraft data while your photo uploads in the background making it what we believe to be the quickest aviation photo upload form on the net.
We even give you a progress bar showing how long until your photo is uploaded!
Quick Screening
We screen most photos within 24 hours.
Any rejections are always given comments detailing the reasons.
Join our growing list of photographers and upload your shots to Plane Mad.

1 - by Johansen 




Rate Us On
Please Wait - Loading